点击右上角
微信好友
朋友圈
请使用浏览器分享功能进行分享
花饽饽“醒狮兔”走红癸卯年 烟台95后女孩云端传非遗******
(新春走基层)花饽饽“醒狮兔”走红癸卯年 烟台95后女孩云端传非遗
中新网烟台2月2日电 题：花饽饽“醒狮兔”走红癸卯年 烟台95后女孩云端传非遗
作者 王娇妮 孙睿姣
和面、揉面、压面、造型……在山东烟台95后女孩臧钗瑗的一双巧手下，面团仿佛经历了“七十二变”，一会儿成了笑眯眯的小白兔，一会儿成了威风的红色醒狮，两部分巧“合体”后，一只可爱的“醒狮兔”就诞生了。
“花饽饽是胶东地区常用的面点，每年春节前几天，家家户户都会准备花饽饽，寓意生活‘蒸蒸日上’。今年是兔年，我们制作的‘醒狮兔’花饽饽颇受市场欢迎。”臧钗瑗称。
胶东花饽饽习俗历史悠久，被广泛用于走亲访友、生日祝寿、婚庆乔迁等场合，入选山东省省级非物质文化遗产名录。
通过网络平台，臧钗瑗将胶东花饽饽技艺传播到各地。 孙睿姣 摄怀着想把花饽饽“做好做新做潮”的念头，两年前，臧钗瑗开启了创业之路。从无人支持到全网点赞，从租用车库当店面到建起五百平方米的工厂，借助互联网，臧钗瑗的事业越来越火，并将花饽饽这项非遗手艺传播到各地。
“食物一定要安全健康。”臧钗瑗告诉记者，过去人们做花饽饽，受条件限制，常用色素染色，皮是不能吃的，因此她对“染料”做了改良。
“绿色取自菠菜，红色取自红曲米，黄色取自南瓜。”臧钗瑗称，她的每个花饽饽都是纯手工制作，原料只有面粉、鸡蛋、牛奶、白砂糖、酵母等，没有任何添加剂。
臧钗瑗做的花饽饽不仅松软、香甜，而且还好看。在工作室中，她现场制作了一只憨态可掬的“醒狮兔”，胖嘟嘟的兔脸上嵌着一双笑眼，头上还戴着威风的醒狮帽，让人爱不释手。
凭借吸睛的外貌和香甜的口感，臧钗瑗的花饽饽渐渐被关注，订单从小县城走向北京、上海、杭州等地。同时，她还开发出婚庆、乔迁、抓周、过寿等系列，以及十二生肖、花束、聚宝盆、福袋、葫芦等单品造型的花饽饽。
2022年下半年，臧钗瑗将制作花饽饽的短视频上传至网络。“很多年轻人通过短视频了解到我，都来找我学习，给花饽饽的制作带来了许多新创意。”臧钗瑗称，通过短视频平台，老手艺有了新的生机与活力，不少学员学会后，回去自己做花饽饽，再通过电商、自媒体等途径销售，每个月也有可观的收入。
“一开始大家觉得年轻人做花饽饽不适合，没有出路。”臧钗瑗却认为，传承老手艺最需要年轻人，只有让年轻人把传统手艺“揉”在手中，才是真正的传承。(完)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
)