盈彩娱乐|平台推荐官方版v2.9.1(2023已更新)

来源：盈彩下载app1720-12-12 17:48

江苏通知，阳性考研考生进入特殊考场参考******

　　12月16日，江苏省教育考试院官网发布《江苏省2023年全国硕士研究生招生考试考生健康应试须知》：

　　江苏省2023年全国硕士研究生招生考试考生健康应试须知

　　一、考前准备

　　1.疫情防控执行属地化管理，考生须提前了解我省各报考点所在设区市最新疫情防控要求。

　　2.考生应当好自己健康的第一责任人，加强健康防护，考前非必要不离开报考点所在设区市；非必要不外出，不前往人员密集场所或参加聚集性活动，外出时全程佩戴口罩，避免乘坐公共交通工具，人际交往保持安全距离。

　　3.12月17日起，考生每日自行测量体温和监测健康状况，登录江苏省2023年研考考生健康申报系统（网址：https://yjs.jseea.cn），按系统提示填报相关信息；所有考生须于12月20日当天进行一次单管核酸检测采样，并于21日22：00前将核酸检测结果填写在健康申报系统，此结果将作为考场安排的参考依据；考生在进入考点时须出示《江苏省2023年全国硕士研究生招生考试考生健康应试承诺书》（从“江苏省教育考试院门户网”下载打印），并在首场考试进场时交给监考员。未按规定在12月20日进行核酸检测采样，并按要求进行网上健康申报的，不能正常参加考试。考生如填报虚假信息，其行为将记入诚信档案。

　　4.考试当天出现干咳等典型症状、其他较重症状以及体温高于37.3℃的考生，进入考点时须主动报告。

　　二、进入考点

　　1.考生应提前规划好出行时间和路线，尽量避免乘坐公共交通工具。赴考途中做好个人防护，全程佩戴医用外科或以上级别口罩。

　　2.考生须至少提前45分钟到达考点，凭本人准考证、有效居民身份证件、苏康码、12月20日当天或以后的核酸检测报告（纸质、电子均可）、《健康应试承诺书》，佩戴口罩进入考点。不佩戴口罩的考生不得进入考点。考生不得因为佩戴口罩影响身份识别。

　　3.核酸检测阳性的考生，根据考点安排进入特殊考场参加考试。

　　4.考生进入考点时，须接受体温测量，体温低于37.3℃方可进入考点；体温异常的考生经考点综合评估后，安排进入相应的考场参加考试。

　　三、应试要求

　　1.考生进入考场后须做好个人防护，提倡全程佩戴口罩。特殊考场、应急处置考场考生须全程佩戴N95口罩。

　　2.考试过程中，非核酸阳性考生如出现发热、干咳、乏力、鼻塞、流涕、咽痛、嗅觉味觉减退、结膜炎、肌痛和腹泻等不适症状，应立即向考点工作人员报告，听从工作人员的安排。

　　3.考试结束时，按监考员指令，考生有序错峰离场，保持安全间距，不得在考点内滞留。

　　四、其他要求

　　1.考生应自觉配合考点做好身体健康检测，对隐瞒或谎报个人健康状况等疫情防控重点信息，以及在考试疫情防控中拒不配合工作人员进行防疫检测、询问、排查的考生，将取消考试资格，并按照有关法律法规予以处理。

　　2.考试疫情防控措施将根据疫情防控形势变化适时调整，请考生关注考点所在设区市疫情防控最新要求，及时了解相关信息。

盈彩娱乐

中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******

　　中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。

资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。

　　2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。

　　日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。

　　日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。

　　事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。

　　因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。

　　日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。

　　《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。

　　德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。

　　日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。

　　国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。

　　太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。

　　Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business

　　By John Lee

　　(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.

　　Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.

　　The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.

　　On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.

　　The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.

　　In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.

　　Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.

　　The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.

　　The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.

　　The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.

　　According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.

　　As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.

　　However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.

　　Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.

　　The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.

　　If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.